· www.radimpex.rs · info@radimpex.rs ·

Vrlo nepraktično. Mnogo koraka u definisanju faza i vrlo lako se pogreši. Troši se mnogo vremena i mnogo živaca. Zato bi sedmica bila bolja, ako bi sadržala novi alat za faze građenja kod objekata visokogradnje. Zašto kod objekata visokogradnje ne uvesti mogućnost da program sam donju etažu (sa sop...

Thank you for your respond. I believe that you'll find the best solution for this problem in next version of Tower.
To the current version might be easier to add tabular report in seismic analysis.
Something like this:

Hello Radimpex Team, Can you introduce calculation of the interstorey drift sensitivity coefficient θ in new buids of Tower 6? EC8: θ = Ptot/Vtot * dr/h * q ≤ 0,10 Ptot is the total gravity load at and above the storey considered in the seismic design situation Vtot is the total seismic storey shear...

OK, I agree with that, that we've commented before. I will wait to see pictures to see what's new in this build, because the "influences in proxy entity for every single MMS load case and for SRSS combination (including combination of MMS load cases)" were correct in several previous builds.

Hello again, I hope these pictures will clarify what I mean:

* Calculation of influences in proxy entity enabled for multi modal seismic load cases and for SRSS combinations.
This feature don't work correct with MMS load cases, and also is still locked for SRSS combination combined with other load cases.
Is this a bug, or I misinterpret this new feauture?

OK. I understand this, and i have a suggestion, you can add max and min values for MMS load cases and combinations. Example: LC 1) - ordinary loadcase: M = -300, N = -100 LC 2) - MMS loadcase M = 100, N = 10 Combination I+II: maxM=-300+100=-200 minM=-300-100=-400 maxN=-100+10=-90 minN=-100-10=-110

Influences in the proxy entity in combinations whit earthquake case are not corect too. Can you fix this?

OK, this is true. Aa1/Aa2 is correct. Thank you for fast response.

6.11.4 Earthquake walls In multi-mode seismic load cases, the signs of all influences (M and N sign) are always positive. The program designs such load cases for all four combinations of these two influences symbol - M>0 i N>0, M>0 i N<0, M<0 i N>0, M<0 i N – and, as a result, adopts the reinforcem...

Why is not writen in manual by this way? Maybe radimpex team have a other opinion for this problem?

Hi, I have two questions for erthquake analysys in Tower: 1.How can i do directional combination according to bulgarian new rules: BDS NPSSZR - 2007? Modal comnination: Eedx=SRSS(Edx1,Edx2...Exn) or Eedx=CQC(Edx1,Edx2...Exn) Eedy=SRSS(Edy1,Edy2...Eyn) or Eedy=CQC(Edy1,Edy2...Eyn) n=modes Directional...